Thursday, February 19, 2009

Leitmotif : Accessible Foreign Policy for Everybody

While researching on Germany’s international broadcasting Deutsche Welle I came across this interesting Web site called Atlantic Community. It is conducted by Atlantic Initiative - a non-profit organization based in Berlin, Germany, that aims at promoting the transatlantic cooperation and strengthening the German foreign policy culture.

The Atlantic Community is an open think tank where members (you have to sign up, but it is free) can discuss and debate on recent policy issues. The founders of the project “recognized the need for a new English-language venture that would strengthen European-American ties and thus reinforce the idea that today’s transatlantic agenda is global.”

In detail the goals of Atlantic Initiative are:
  • Spread the message that today's transatlantic agenda is global: International challenges like terrorism, the energy crisis, and the rise of new powers in Asia demand a unified Western policy.
  • Promote frank debates and collaboration between Europe and North America on issues of globalization and foreign policy.
  • Cultivate and improve intellectual exchange across the Atlantic through increased networking opportunities between decision-makers, senior experts, as well as a new generation of students and future policy professionals.
  • Promote and advance the future generation of decision-makers.
  • Analyze foreign policy and the challenges of the twenty-first century in such a way that everybody can understand them. Our leitmotif is: Accessible Foreign Policy for Everybody!
    (source: http://www.atlantic-initiative.org)

The issues dealt with are in direct relation to our course discussions and the contributing authors include RĂ¼diger Lentz, the head of the Deutsche Welle Washington office (he is also the head of the Atlantic Initiative in the US) and scholars who research in the field of transatlantic relations.

What I liked about the Web site is the approach to open the discussion to a wider public and make the issue of foreign policy accessible to those who are not as much engaged on a regular basis, but have their own visions and opinions.

The fact that such an online portal enters the foreign policy discussion is also characteristic for the current stage of public diplomacy. As discussed in class and described in the Gilboa reading "Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy," more and more new players engage in international affairs, investigate PD activities and become active themselves.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

The United States, Papua New Guinea, and Diplomacy 2.0

Diplomacy 2.0 combined the International Visitor Leadership Program with a blog to bolster the effectiveness of the overall initiative. I would like your feedback and opinions on the effectiveness of these programs and initiatives. For instance, there are all of 8 followers of the blog at the moment, but there are some insightful portions of the blog in terms of the impact that this program participant will have in his community and his country beyond already occupying a seat in Parliament:

The trip was announced unofficially before Christmas 2008 and the news spread like wildfire throughout my district (Wau/Bulolo, Morobe Province). I was very surprised that people from all walks of life enquired during my electoral visit.
During the festive season, I was summoned by Village Elders in Mapos One (1) Village to brief them about my trip. I thoroughly briefed the leaders. Some of the elders were very concerned about my security as they know and heard about the evils of this world and some were even worried about my personal security. After lengthy discussion, I got many words of caution and advise from the village elders. They also prayed for my safety and to return home in one piece as Wau/Bulolo District needed my leadership to deliver the much need basic goods and services.

I was privileged to have been nominated by the U.S. Embassy Port Moresby and selected by the Office of the International Visitors Leadership Program in Washington, DC to participate in the 2009 International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP) “Transition Power in the U.S. Federal System”.

Here is a list of the participants he lists in the blog:

1.Egypt - Ms. Lobna Fadel El Ansary Mahmoud EL ANSARY - Senior Program Officer, North America File, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology (MCIT).

2. Ghana - Mr. Paul ANDOM-OTCHERE - Producer & President, Metro TV.

3. India - Mr.Madhavan Ramanathan MUCKAI -Head of Research, Parliamentary Research Service (PRS), Legislative Research, Center for Policy Research.

4. Macedonia - Mr.Saso KOKALANOV - Editor-in-Chief, Dnevnik (dailyu newspaper).

5. Malaysia - Mr.Chee Keong SIM - Special Assistant to the Penang State Cabinet Executive Counselor.

6. Mexico - Mr.Carlos Alonso SALINAS OSORNIO - Secretary to the Mayor of Guadalajara, Jalisco State. (Withdrew)

7. Nepal - Mr. Bhimarjun ACHARYA - Advocate, Alliance Law Firm.

8. New Zealand - Mr. Scott Anthony CAMPBELL - Television Political Reporter, NZ Parliament.

9. Nigeria - Senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

10. Norway - Mr. Bjorn Willy ROBSTAD - Secretary General, Conference of Parliamentarians of the Arctic Region.

11. Pakistan - Mr. Syed Muhammad MEHDI - Cordinator, Foreign Affairs Liason Committee, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N)

12. Phillipines - Ms. Rosario Sofia Santos VILLA - Head International Broadcast Services ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation.

13.Turkey - Ms. Fatma DEMIRELLI - Managing Editor, Todays Zaman (Daily Paper).

14. Ukraine - Mr. Mykola SIRUK -Head, International Section, Den (Daily Paper)

15. Malaysia - Ms. Hannah YEOH - Member of State Assembly, Subang Jaya
As China continues with its rapid economic development, expands its share of world trade, and hones its diplomatic prowess, the value of the Chinese language likewise increases. As People’s Daily comments: today, Chinese is more than just the language associated with the country’s 5,000-year civilization and oriental philosophical thought; it is also a fast-developing commercial lingua franca in the Pacific basin. Its practical value has surpassed that of French, German, and even Japanese in much of the world and its future opportunities seem limitless. As the article below noticed, to an extent, this is a case of history repeating itself with a twist. Just as Americans started studying Japanese in droves in the 1980s, when Japan's economy was ascendant, so today, as China rises, the world is embracing Mandarin. The increasing popularity of learning Chinese is most notable in Southeast and East Asia. This article does mention that sometimes, political tensions cause troubles to this “Soft sphere”. For example, China and Japan, two historical enemies, has witnessed declining exchanges during times when their relationship gets cold.
I found Joshua Kurlantzick who has studied on China’s Soft Power for many years also posted to this article. He said that: After an initial rocky start trying to promote Chinese language studies in the late 1990s, the Chinese government, including its ministry of education, seems to have realized the need to divorce language studies from explicit government support. Hence the name of the Chinese language programs -- Confucius Institutes -- betrays no links to China's own political system or modern history; in actuality, Mao tried to disown Confucius' legacy. Hence, also, although the Chinese government has paid for at least the first year of a number of these language programs overseas, it does not highlight the government support, and generally allows local universities to take the lead. To me, it is interesting to observe that China, in the 3 decades of tremendous changes after Deng’s Opening and Reform, has become a combination that has a free economy, a socialist authoritarian polity with Chinese characters as it is called, and resurgence of thousands years of old civilization, especially with Confucius “harmony” culture and thoughts increasingly coming to play in China and abroad. How can “harmonize” the three? It is no easy job for the Chinese leaders.
Find Joshua Kurlantzick’s original post at: http://uscpublicdiplomacy.com/index.php/newsroom/pdblog_detail/20060626_chinas_public_diplomacy_promoting_chinese_language_studies/
Find the article below at: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1205427,00.html
Get Ahead, Learn Mandarin
Monday, Jun. 19, 2006
By Austin Ramzy
It's Friday night in Ikebukuro, a Tokyo entertainment district full of cheap bars and pachinko parlors. As the office workers head to their favorite watering holes, three salarymen split from the crowd and enter a decrepit building that stands between a karaoke lounge and a tavern. Ignoring the sounds of sirens, drunken crooning and breaking glass outside, Hidetoshi Seki, Takashi Kudo and Yuji Yano huddle in a tiny room just big enough for a table for four, and open their Chinese textbooks. For the next 50 minutes the trio, all from a small trading company, practice describing their favorite foods and hobbies in Mandarin. Despite their crumpled shirts and five o'clock shadows, they are having a blast. The young female instructor at B-Chinese Language School indulges them as they crack jokes and make fun of each others' muddled pronunciation. Their language classes are the first lessons that any of them have taken since childhood, says Yano, 39. "We sort of unanimously agreed that Chinese would be a useful skill to acquire."
No kidding. The urge that drives those salarymen to pass up karaoke on a Friday night is increasingly common. In the past, when people set out to improve themselves by learning another language, those that didn't already speak it usually picked English. But while English may be the only truly international language, millions of tongues are wagging over what is rapidly becoming the world's other lingua franca: Mandarin. Seen as a key skill for people hitching their futures to China's economic rise, Mandarin is becoming common currency, particularly in Asia where trade ties with the Middle Kingdom are supplanting those of the region's longtime primary partner, the U.S. Indeed, because English is spoken so universally, it no longer offers companies and employees the edge it once did, according to a recent report by British linguist David Gaddol. If you want to get ahead, learn Mandarin. "In many Asian countries, in Europe and the USA, Mandarin has emerged as the new must-have language," Gaddol notes.
To an extent, this is a case of history repeating itself with a twist. Just as Americans started studying Japanese in droves in the 1980s, when Japan's economy was ascendant, so today, as China rises, the world is embracing Mandarin. (It doesn't hurt that Chinese is spoken by an estimated one out of every six people on earth.) In South Korea, 160,000 high school and university students are studying the Chinese language, an increase of 66% over the past five years. The number of Japanese secondary schools offering Mandarin more than tripled between 1993 and 2005, and in Japan it's now the most taught foreign language after English. Mandarin is even being pushed within China itself, where hundreds of Chinese dialects can make communication tricky. The central government has promoted standard Mandarin, or putonghua, since the 1950s. Growing internal migration has boosted that effort, and putonghua is now commonly heard on the streets of Shanghai and Guangzhou, cities with their own dialects.
Outside Asia, the ranks of students studying Chinese are small but growing rapidly. From 2000-2004, the number of students in England, Wales and Northern Ireland doing Advanced Level exams (those normally taken at age 18) in Chinese climbed by 57%. In the U.S., Chinese still lags far behind traditional foreign languages like French and Spanish, but China is the fastest growing destination for college students studying abroad. "I thought about what I was going to do after I graduated from college," says Kim Ku Jin, a 26-year-old from Pusan, South Korea. "How am I going to earn money? How am I going to eat?" The answer: buckle down and learn Mandarin. When Kim completed his obligatory two-year military service, he headed to the Chinese capital to pursue a language degree at the Beijing Language and Culture University. "In China I will definitely have opportunities," he says. Claudia Ross, a Chinese-language professor at College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts, says she's hearing the same things from her pupils. "Students who enrolled in Chinese used to tell me their parents would say, 'Why on earth are you studying this?'" says Ross. "Now students regularly come in saying, 'I'm taking Chinese because my parents say I should.'" At Holy Cross, enrollment in first-year Chinese doubled last year. "There are dollar signs attached to it," says Ross.
Mandarin was not always so trendy. It's daunting to learn, especially for Westerners, because of the tones used in speech to shift meaning�to say nothing of the thousands of characters that must be memorized to achieve true literacy. Politics threw up another impediment. During the Cold War, when China was sealed off from the rest of the world, fluency in Chinese was considered, at best, an arcane academic pursuit for diplomats and students of acupuncture or Tang poetry. At worst, it was considered the language of the enemy. Despotic right-wing governments in some Asian countries, fearing their regimes would be toppled by the spread of communism, thought of Chinese-speakers as Maoist revolutionary threats. In Indonesia, Suharto banned Chinese-language publications and closed almost all Mandarin schools. But after then President Abdurrahman Wahid lifted the ban in 1999, six universities added Mandarin courses, as did dozens of smaller language centers.
Now, students who can put "fluent in Mandarin" on their resume s are seeing the payoff. Jakarta resident Imam Fanani, 26, was initially discouraged when he began hunting for work last year because many of his friends had been unable to find good-paying jobs. But a day after he submitted his resume to several employment websites, he had three job offers. His edge? A degree from the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing. "There is no discrimination against the language anymore," says Imam, who now works at a conglomerate owned by an Indonesian Chinese. "In fact, you could even say it's become kind of fashionable."
It's in vogue even in the backwaters of Asia's least developed countries. In 2004, China became Cambodia's biggest foreign investor, and some Cambodians now think Mandarin is as useful as English. The Chea family in Phnom Penh decided to spread its bets: Rotha, a 13-year-old boy, studies English while his 12-year-old sister, Sophea, learns Mandarin. Spending money on language lessons has earned their parents, Chea Song and his wife Sotheary, the ridicule of neighbors, who point out that the Cheas don't have a proper house�they live in their open-air coffee-and-noodle shop. "Some people criticize me, saying I have no home to live in but I send my daughter to learn Chinese," says Chea Song. "But even if I'm poor, I want the best education for my children." English may help his son find a job with one of the many aid agencies working in Cambodia, or allow him to pursue medical studies, Chea reckons. His daughter's Mandarin skills may land her a job in a private business or as a translator. As he sees it, "The whole world is speaking Chinese."
EXPORTING MANDARIN
Eager to assert itself internationally, the Chinese government is itself on a drive to promote Mandarin abroad in hopes of putting it on a par with English. "Promoting the use of Chinese among overseas people has gone beyond purely cultural issues," said Hu Youqing, a National People's Congress deputy and Chinese-language professor at Nanjing University, in an interview with the government-owned China Daily. "It can help build up our national strength and should be taken as a way to develop our country's 'soft power.'"
To that end, over the past two years Beijing has opened language and cultural centers called Confucius Institutes, modeled on Spain's Instituto Cervantes or Germany's Goethe-Institute in more than 30 countries, including Australia, Japan, Kenya, the U.S. and Sweden. China has also deployed more than 2,000 Peace Corps-like volunteers to teach Mandarin overseas, mostly in Asian nations such as Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia and South Korea. Meanwhile, back home, China has been rapidly upgrading Mandarin-language schools to handle a rising influx of overseas students. In Beijing, for example, Capital Normal University's North Number 1 campus features a pair of new gray steel and glass towers with polished stone floors and an indoor swimming pool. China's vastly ambitious goal is to have 100 million foreigners studying Mandarin by the end of the decade. "China is like an imperial civilization, or the U.S. or Britain or France. It tends to view the world on its own terms," says Nicholas Ostler, the British author of Empires of the Word: A Language History of the World. "In China, people talk in Chinese. More and more, they expect others to speak to them in Chinese, too."
China's efforts to spread Mandarin are managed from the 17th floor of an office building in the northwest corner of Beijing. There, school officials from around the world come to talk with Xu Lin, a voluble woman with an intense gaze who heads the National Office for Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language. On a hot, smoggy day last fall, she hosted a delegation of American educational and business leaders, including a former assistant secretary of education and school superintendents from New York and California. They sat at attention as Xu outlined her agency's plans for teaching Chinese to the world. To close the meeting, Xu signed an agreement with the commissioner of education in Kentucky to help his state develop a Chinese-language program. Xu and the commissioner, Gene Wilhoit, shook hands and Xu presented him with a gift: a digital wand that reads Chinese characters aloud when dragged across text. Wilhoit tried it out. An uncomfortable silence followed. "I think it's broken," one of Xu's subordinates muttered. Someone fiddled with the gadget, and Wilhoit tried again. There was a pause, and then a mechanical voice droned out one of the phrases that Xu deemed critical to survival in China: "Ganbei!"
Kentucky may have to rely heavily on such technology to teach students to say "cheers" in Chinese. The state has only a handful of Mandarin classes, such as a program that started up in January at a Louisville elementary school, because there aren't enough trained Mandarin teachers. The problem is widespread in the U.S. According to a 2004 survey by the College Board, a nonprofit organization that conducts college placement exams, 2,400 high schools wanted to offer Advanced Placement classes in Chinese, far more than the few hundred schools the organization expected. "The level of interest is high, but the level of expertise is low," says Scott McGinnis, an academic adviser at the Defense Language Institute in Washington. In January, U.S. President George W. Bush announced plans to spend $114 million next year to boost the number of instructors and augment educational programs for "critical need" languages including Arabic, Chinese, Russian, Hindi and Farsi.
For now, Kentucky educators are relying in large part on young Chinese volunteers such as Zhao Jing, a 29-year-old from the northern coastal city of Tianjin. A year ago, Zhao's knowledge of Kentucky was limited to visits to Ken De Ji, the Chinese name for Kentucky Fried Chicken. But after being recruited by the Kentucky Department of Education to develop the state's Mandarin curriculum, she drives hours to rural towns to talk with students and teachers about China. At noon on a recent Monday, Zhao carried her laptop to an audio-visual studio in the state education building in Frankfort, set up a PowerPoint presentation on an octagonal table, and waited for her students. One by one, department employees filed into the room and took seats around the table for the twice-weekly Chinese class. "Ni hao," they said, and then they began a lesson on the Chinese New Year and signs of the zodiac. When Zhao asked department policy advisor Debbie Hendricks, 51, to say her birth animal, Hendricks laughed, "I'm in over my head."
SETTING THE PACE
The rest of the world isn't going to wait for people like this to catch up in the race to learn Chinese. East Asians have a head start, due to the long history of interaction between China and its neighbors. China is now South Korea's biggest trading partner, having surpassed Japan in 2002 and the U.S. in 2004 and its people are signing up for Chinese lessons with zeal. South Koreans are the largest group of foreigners studying in China, representing about 40% of the 110,800 total last year. This trend is boosted by cultural ties, both new and old. Korean music and drama are among the most popular offerings on the mainland today, while 60% of Korean vocabulary comes from Chinese (similarly, written Japanese has several thousand characters borrowed from China). While that language transfer took place over centuries, Chinese now spreads across Asian borders at the speed of an instant message. Woo Jae Hoa, a 22-year-old student in Seoul, practices Mandarin by chatting online with a Chinese girl he met on the Internet. He types phonetically as he has yet to learn many Chinese characters. His new pen pal responds with simple, out-of-a-textbook answers, though they also delve into lighter topics, such as Korean pop music.
But a shared history can also be a curse. The widespread popularity of Chinese-language study in Japan has been hindered by the sensitive relationship between the former enemies. Last year there were 24 students in Mitsuko Yajima's Mandarin courses at Asia University. This year, following anti-Japanese demonstrations in several large Chinese cities, there are just 14. "Japan is slow to nurture a population of Mandarin students," says Yajima, who has taught Mandarin at the university for 30 years. "We are way behind South Korea."
That's not just an academic concern. As China's economic clout grows, the ability to reduce frictions and misunderstandings in business communications offers a strategic advantage. Even enthusiastic promoters of Mandarin aren't predicting that it will ever overtake English as the world's common language. But just as knowing English proved a key to getting ahead in the 20th century, learning Chinese will provide an edge in the 21st. It won't be easy, though. Acquiring the language requires hundreds of hours of study, countless early mornings memorizing characters, or, if you're a salaryman in Tokyo like Hidetoshi Seki and his pals, practicing sentence patterns while everyone else is out having fun. "We deal with a lot of Chinese clients," says Seki, 39. "But we weren't sent here by the company. We're drinking buddies, and decided to do something more constructive with our time than guzzling beer." Getting ahead sometimes requires a little sacrifice.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

High Hurdles to Cultural Diplomacy



In this post on WhirledView, Patricia Kushlis laments how overzealous security concerns and bureaucratic red-tape stifle public exhibitions of American art abroad, whether through State's Art in Embassies program or on display at American Cultural Centers in foreign capitals. She speaks to the issue with some authority--having organized an exhibit of American sculpture art in downtown athens back in the days when an ample USIA budget and more reasonable security protocol facilitated that kind of cultural diplomacy.

America Houses Need American Exhibits, Too
So, it seems to me if the Obama Administration is serious about reestablishing America Houses (or Centers) throughout the Muslim world then it needs to rethink the current restrictions on exhibits – because, believe me, there needs to be something attractive and compelling on the walls and in the exhibition halls of those institutions.


I agree with Kushlis that few--if any--foreign citizens probably have real access to art displays sponsored by U.S. embassies, despite the best efforts of our Cultural Attaches. While her qualms over funding and logistics are well-founded, we should consider security barriers to cultural exhibits and performances as a perhaps necessary evil.

To pick Jordan as an example, as I often do, it was hard enough for me--let alone the average Jordanian--to take advantage of cultural resources in the inner sanctuary of the fortress that is the U.S. Embassy in Amman, or even an off-site American jazz quartet concert that was essentially open only to elite Jordanians with the right connections to fetch advance tickets. Yet, the accessibility of American high culture in parts of the world such as the Middle East is subject to very stark security realities. The library and cultural information center of Amman’s Fulbright House was bombed (at night) in 2005, an event that probably well explains the discrete location of the new Fulbright center and lack of an American Cultural Center in the country.

The upshot of these realities is that commercialized pop culture overshadows (in fact, dominates) any attempts at PD-sponsored fine art displays and exchanges in the region. As we discussed in class, Jordanians and other Arabs are thus bombarded with Hollywood’s finest takes on Middle Eastern intrigue like the shoot-em-up flick The Kingdom or worse still, Body of Lies. A prominent Jordanian blogger, Naseem Tarawnah (Black Iris of Jordan), had this to say about the DiCaprio/Crowe thriller:

Jordan is referenced in a pretty negative way, especially with the extensive referencing of the [Jordanian Security Service] GID’s notorious torture tactics. Calling the country’s primary security apparatus as the “fingernail factory” wasn’t very flattering. However, these sorts of things are kind of expected from a Hollywood movie.

The solution for reinvigorating this ‘softest’ of soft power, cultural public diplomacy, in the Arab world seems elusive. Kushlis, for her part, offers up this plea:

Maybe the Art in Embassies art is – for whatever reasons – off limits to those of us plebians, but then a public diplomacy office with sufficient funding, know-how, and ability to coordinate exhibits (and this takes skill and know-how) needs to be established.

It can be done – but not the way the State Department’s public diplomacy efforts, staff and budgets operate now.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Soft Power and the War on Terror

This is kind of an older article, from November, but I thought it was very interesting given our discussions on soft power last week. Al Qaeda and sympathizers are a huge domestic problem for Saudi Arabia, and the country has developed this rehabilitation program for detainees. It's interesting because the heart of the program is this idea of "correcting" religious interpretations, putting these guys in a room with a religious scholar who explains why Al Qaeda doesn't interpret Islam properly.

The article also mentions some other initiatives in the same vein; one that I've heard more about elsewhere is this kind of ideological task force made up of psychologists and religious scholars who roam the internet looking for radical chat rooms and then start debating with people. Because these are domestic programs, they aren't technically Public Diplomacy, but they have elements of it, especially since the target audience is explicitly transnationalized through the jihad experience. I feel this case in particular highlights some of the tensions between PD as an effective strategic practice, and propaganda as a form of attempted brainwashing. On the one hand, the campaign outlined in the article seems much more intelligent and effective than just hunting terrorists down and locking them up at Guantanamo, but on the other hand I get just a bit of a "Clockwork Orange" feeling from the whole idea. Thoughts?

Friday, February 13, 2009

Obama Beyond the Beltway

The Editors

The New York Times

 

This past week, Obama unleashed his greatest political force, himself.  Instead of staying in Washington to sort out the stimulus package, he went to the people.  Utilizing his campaign approaches, he spoke with the people about the new bill and received their feedback.  He listened and tried his best to solve their financial issues.  While not an example of public diplomacy, it is a great example of soft power.  Instead of trying to coerce the American public into supporting policies, Obama attempts to attract the people.  He employed his own personal culture, the true American Dream, to gain the trust of the public.  Many Americans have felt that Obama gave into Washington; this move to visit the country has altered their opinion and renewed their faith. 

 

While it is not unique for a president to reach out to the people as Franklin D. Roosevelt did with his fireside chat, it is a very different approach from President Bush.  President Bush never altered his message and appeared closed to the opinions of the outside world, isolating the United States.  Obama's campaign approach to receive support for domestic policies conveys the same theme as his approach to the Middle East, going to the people and listening to their concerns.  He has opened up the United States to the public- both international and domestic. 

I am Canadian

This might not be a very scholarly post, but I remembered watching this Molson commercial in a Cross-Cultural Communications class once upon a time. It's relates pretty well to our brief discussion of branding, and says something about the significance of media in international relations...even if we're talking about commercial relations.